Increasing entropy
Privacy in crypto isn’t about TVL or pool size—it’s about entropy: the uncertainty that obscures who did what. Most tools miss this, and it shows in their UX and fragility. If entropy is the real primitive, what would a system built around it look like?
Aiming.
Crypto wallets evolved around degens and technical users, not the people we claim to be building for. The essentials—sending value, executing transactions, understanding balances—are still clumsy and fragile, and we’ve accepted trade-offs consumers would never tolerate. If the core experience is this misaligned, is it any surprise mainstream adoption hasn’t arrived?
Privacy is shielded from reality
Privacy has re-entered the spotlight after years in the wilderness, and everyone is asking why now. The answer sits somewhere in crypto’s version of Maslow’s pyramid: only after securing funds, building primitives, and enabling payments does privacy become visible again. Yet most solutions still shoot in the middle — mixing anonymity with privacy, or hiding data while exposing identity. If the foundations are finally ready, why does our approach to privacy still feel so incomplete?